Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
I am SO proud to announce a shift from sound hole of 9cm (typical Torres design) to a bigger one at 9.53cm ( = 3.75 inches).
The chronicle:
[Over the past few weeks, I have been testing 5 different guitars, constructed of different woods, from different luthiers, 3 of them Toroni guitars. Important tools used:
NPA PITCH, GTG, TIRANDO COMPLETO & MY EARS]
What "sparked" the research (for "The Hole-y Wars" as I like to call it) was a new sound hole ordered for an old guitar of mine (Antonio Lorca guitar), which was bigger than the ordinary and specifically 10.5 cm in diameter (thanks dad!). The day I got it I immediately spotted the difference in tone (since I knew this guitar since childhood). What I realized instantly was that there was something that the rest of the guitars with the ordinary hole lacked. I let it go and called it a day.
The next day I started comparing with the other 4 guitars of mine, even recording some samples. It became quite obvious to me that the ordinary hole lacked some of the virtues of the new bigger hole, virtues that one would describe as "open-ness", "airy-ness" or even "brightness" (perceived as such, actually not, proper strings after GTG aka Guitar Tone Grading remedy that).
The problem:
So the standard sound hole of the classical guitar limits the true potential of how the guitar can actually sound like. There is a feeling of compression, pressure-tightness, "darkness", blurriness and introversion. So in other words, there is a limited projection of the sound, the sound does not reach the audience as "whole-heartedly" and "generously" as it could & should. (Tuning is of course also affected)
The method:
I was certain of the problem, but how could one measure that in absolute? I wondered...
The 10.5 cm Lorca guitar (also Toroni by the way) was offering what the rest 4 guitars couldn't offer BUT at the cost that it went too far to the opposite direction. That meant that now the attack of the notes lacked that gravitas, "the feet" to stand upon and the tone end result was almost too silly. As if the guitar was mocking the notes in a smiling manner. So yeah, the first experiment was helpful enough to show me the importance of the size of the hole, but one might say I ruined that guitar for good.
My next move was to have the Cuenca Nr.10 ordered with a bigger hole. This time I asked for 10 cm diameter. The result was indeed much better than the 10.5 and 9 centimeters, but still a bit towards the opposite site as well, together with the Lorca 10.5 cm guitar.
I ran quite some tests, different passages along the whole fretboard, but it was a harmonics test that was the most revealing for me. Specifically trying harmonics on the 12th fret showed that:
- the 10.5cm hole smeared the harmonics towards the "bright" extrovert side for the 2nd and 1st string
- the 10cm hole speared the harmonics towards the "bright" extrovert side for the 1st string ONLY!
Today I am glad to inform you that my latest experiment, which was a SUCCESS, was the 9.5 cm hole. NOT ONLY did the guitar sound perfect and like never before (a handmade Eythimiades guitar that again I know too damn well, since 1996) BUT ALSO the harmonics test was 100% successful, meaning that this time all 3 nylon strings had that "protective" attack "shield" around them, yet not sounding squeezed or compressed AT ALL!
Magical times indeed:
Now that I am announcing this, the Toroni Nr.1 guitar is waiting to get the new NPA Sound Hole and of course, you will get to sample the sound of it very soon :)
Just like the NPA Pitch, you are free to use the NPA Sound Hole if you want to for your guitar(s).
Don't be ungrateful though and remember to state who you learned from ;)
PROUDLY,
NICK PAPADOPOULOS
******************
Links to social media:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/vtL94zXkYCZqPVvk/
Very glad to introduce a NEW SERVICE that I will be offering called GTG, guitar tone grading.
GTG service aims to categorize classical guitars according to their tone and more specifically in regards to their brightness. So, how bright is your guitar? Now the time to find out.
And why is this all needed one might ask. Well for starters, it is an audio anomaly and by no means a preference. There are many elements to factor when judging the audio of classical guitar such as volume, sustain, projection, timbre, harmonics etc but brightness (or "color" if someone uses it to describe brightness) is NOT one of them and shouldn't be.
Why it is an anomaly: To put it simply, a bright guitar says a note and insinuates a higher one. The opposite happens with a dark one. This registers as a false note to everybody's ears, consciously or subconsciously.
BUUUT..... strings can do magic it seems!!!
I have some great news to share. During the past couple of months I researched strings thoroughly once more (last time was 2016) and managed to find the BEST ones (custom set) to fit my Toroni Nr.1. (They are not the hard tension D'Addario ones I shared on my page, that is a good full set to satisfy base needs of most guitarists, this time I am talking perfection). The amazing thing is that they were also a perfect match for my Cuenca Nr.10 (converted to Toroni), a guitar which is amazingly balanced despite not having the depth of quality that one might desire. Tested on another hand-made guitar by Alkis Eythymiades and got similar results!!!
ERGO: totally different guitars -> same results
So by then I realized 2 things: 1) that the woods I chose for the Toroni Nr.1 guitar indeed translated into a very balanced and honest sound and 2) that this custom set could be perfect for ALL "balanced/neutral/normal" guitars out there.
The confirmation that this was indeed the case came a week later, when I attempted to "fix" the ultra-brightness of my Dieter Mueller guitar. Used my custom perfect set as reference and found out how much brighter the Mueller guitar was by correcting the brightness of one string. Then followed the analogy of the custom set to test one more string. Success! (At the moment I am waiting for the full custom set to typically confirm the experiment but I have zero doubts it will word hence the announcement).
Just to inform you, the Dieter Mueller guitar got the grade B6!!! (grading system shown in the photo)
Why is this needed again??? Because not only can you know how much bright your guitar is, but also I can tell you the EXACT strings to use in order to make it shine. In other words, you can have the tone of your guitar CORRECTED !!!
The service will cost 250 Euros. Up to 100 Euros will be spent on strings for trials and the rest for my work which will be constant throughout the course of 1 week. After that, if I haven't come back with a successful result or have doubts about it, I quit and you get your money back (I don't think this is a possible scenario though).
Great times for the classical guitar, thanks for your attention,
Nick Papadopoulos
******************
Links to social media:
The 1st built-from-scratch Toroni guitar is finally here!!!
Thank you once again παναγιωτης Λαμπης for making my dreams come true.
Toroni Nr. 1 ladies and gentlemen!!! Audio recording(s) to come in the near future...
******************
Links to social media:
I had previously shown my first scepticism on the matter on the 31st December 2023 (New year’s eve) by posting a YouTube video of a violin player that presented the same piece in 3 different pitches (https://www.youtube.com/shorts/dfaeWDo9bXc), none of which sounded especially fulfilling to my ears.
It is true that up to this point, I never had any real reason to question the 440Hz standard nor do I have the fetish to just mess around with anything, only to present my version of it. On the contrary, I usually need clear evidence before starting a research. This time I happened to bump into that video, which led to another and another until I ended up watching videos about the "cosmic" frequency of 432Hz that the Illuminati try to hide from us! (Yeah, that kind of conspiracy theories etc) --- By the way, 432Hz sucks big time.
So I spent some time tuning my classical guitar using different pitches, thanks to an online tuner that offered exact measurements at Hz, even with decimals! And then I remembered that throughout my life I always had a tendency to tune my guitar higher than the 440Hz standard and this memory convinced me that I should go higher in pitch. Indeed, using my “golden ears” I chose the 445Hz because no matter which string I played, it gave the full identity of the note ( = in tune) without being either too forward (overstatement) or too recessed (understatement). 440Hz being clearly dark and blear. I even chose the 445Hz by comparing just the tuning forks alone (using YouTube videos). So far of course this choice of mine was nothing than a mere preference with zero scientific explanation.
Fast forward 2 weeks later (in the meantime I tested the NPA pitch 445Hz all the time with the guitar getting maximum satisfaction each and every time), I decided to take this test to the NPDT Process territory. Oh my God was I amazed... The recording I tested (which you will get very very soon on the channel of NPDT Process), despite NOT being what was actually recorded (remember NPDT Process brings out THE TRUTH) it actually sounded so much better!!! Now this test had higher merit because NPDT Process IS a scientific discovery that is based on acoustics.
My plan is to incorporate the NPA 445Hz standard to NPDT Process from now on and this will mark THE ONLY modification NPDT Process will be making to the audio content. So I know this will be a slight shift from what was originally recorded BUT it is for the good of music and the ears of the listener and that is sufficient enough reason for me.
I do not know at this point whether the two NPDT versions will co-exist or whether the new pitch-based NPDT will consume the so far regular one, we 'll see how it goes from here.
SUMMARIZING
As of 16/1/2024 Nick Papadopoulos rejects the A440 as standard and endorses a NEW standard the A445 from now on called NPA pitch standard which is higher by 1/5 of a semitone than A440 (or 1.2 units by eastern Byzantine music measurements).
******************
Links to social media:
- Επιστροφή στον κιθαριστικό κόσμο με δημιουργία σχολής και επίσημης βάσης της τεχνικής "Tirando Completo©"
- Δημιουργία νέου μοντέλου κλασικής κιθάρας μετά από 170+ χρόνια από το μοντέλο Torres με τίτλο "Toroni Guitar"
- Ιδανικοί δακτυλισμοί για διατονικές κλίμακες (μείζονες-ελάσσονες) και αρπισμούς
- Ανακάλυψη νέας σημειογραφίας για την κλασική κιθάρα (ΔΕΝ υπάρχουν σχέδια ακόμα για δημοσιοποίηση της)
- Νέο τρέμολο (Θα ανακοινωθεί στο 1ο τετράμηνο συνοδευόμενο από ηχητικό υλικό)
- Νέα τεχνική δεξιού χεριού με τίτλο "A-style" (Πιθανόν να ανακοινωθεί μέσα στο 2024)
- Νέες ασκήσεις δεξιού και αριστεριού χεριού
- Έγινε επικοινωνία με τουλάχιστον 60 κιθαριστές ανά τον κόσμο μέσω μέσεντζερ (διάσημους και μη, κυρίως Έλληνες ωστόσο) από τους οποίους οι περισσότεροι ούτε καν διάβασαν τις ανακοινώσεις πχ Sergio Assad, Carlo Domeniconi, Zoran Dukic, Aniello Desiderio, Ana Vidovic, Eva Fampas B, Fotis Koutsothodoros, Kostas Grigoreas κ.ά., κάποιοι τις διάβασαν αλλά αδιαφόρησαν πχ Elena Papandreou, Goran Krivokapic, Evangelos Assimakopoulos, Evangelos Boudounis, Sharon Isbin, Nora Buschmann κ.ά. και βέβαια κάποιοι εκφράστηκαν με αγάπη όπως πχ Aliosha De Santis, Patrik Czuczor, Haris Symeonidis κ.ά. (ευχαριστώ!) ενώ κάποιοι άλλοι πιο κομπλεξικοί με έκαναν μπλοκ πχ Costas Cotsiolis, Dimitris Kourzakis (δείτε φωτό).
[Γενικά απογοήτευση ο κιθαριστικός κόσμος σε όλα τα επίπεδα, ούτε μουσικοί σωστοί (το γνώριζα) ούτε τεχνίτες σωστοί (επίσης το γνώριζα) και κατα πώς φαίνεται ούτε ανθρώπινοι (το διαπίστωσα προσφάτως)]
******************
Links to social media:
Before Tirando Completo of course! (I miss the long hair...)
----------------------------------------
THERE IS A NEW TREMOLO COMING IN THE 1ST QUARTER OF 2024!!!
IT CAN BE CALLED "TIRANDO COMPLETO TREMOLO" = "TC TREMOLO" (OR EVEN "TCT", IF YOU WILL)
******************
Links to social media:
https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2FLGAZin1MnyE%3Fsi%3DVBNF
INVITATION
We invite you to come and try out the brand new classical guitar model named TORONI guitar, which aligns to the philosophy and principles of the classical guitar technique TIRANDO COMPLETO©, on
SUNDAY 18/2/2024
at the guitar school Tirando Completo
Michail Chourmouzi 2, K. Toumba, Thessaloniki
hours 10:00-15:00 & 17:00-21:00
reservations: (+30)-6934-687000
Sincerely,
Nick Papadopoulos &
Panagiotis Labis
******************
Links to social media:
PLEASE DO NOT CONFUSE THE TORONI GUITAR WITH OTHER CUSTOM GUITARS !!!!!!!
There have been many occasions throughout history when guitarists would make custom changes to their guitars to suit their personal preferences, and if asked, they would probably acknowledge that themselves, that it is ONLY FOR THEM.
The purpose of the Toroni guitar is the EVOLUTION of the instrument and evolution means the instrument being PLAYABLE BY EVERYBODY, not just by the person who ordered it.
The person in the picture is a good example. Clearly his intent was to just have a proportionally fatter neck than the rest so he could prove something about his left hand, that it is more skillful or whatever.
This guitar in the picture (or any other custom design for the matter) has absolutely NO RELATION to the Toroni guitar despite it also having a bigger string spacing which came as a SUBSEQUENT of the fatter neck (so random in terms of testing).
(And let's also state the obvious, it looks unnatural and ugly)
******************
Links to social media:
At Panagiotis's lab
Side by side comparison: Toroni guitar VS standard guitar
Toroni guitar at home
"Introducing the brand new classical guitar model:
TORONI GUITAR
∞
150+ years have passed since Antonio De Torres gave us the well-known classical guitar design, now the time has come for the necessary update. In accordance to the demands of the guitar technique Tirando Completo©,
Nick Papadopoulos proudly presents the TORONI (classical) guitar!"
----------------------------------
Hit the link (yellow button) to download PDF containing Toroni guitar specifications and benefits.
A full presentation with lots of photographic material will be coming soon, first: a presentation of a normal classical guitar having been converted into Toroni guitar (finished) and after a while: a presentation of a new built-from-scratch genuine Toroni guitar (the 1st!!! - under construction at the moment).
All guitar builds thanks to the brilliant craftsmanship of luthier Panagiotis Labis. Contact Panagiotis to order a Toroni guitar here: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100082965402371
******************
Links to social media:
BEST FINGERING FOR GUITAR ARPEGGIOS, written by me.
A sequel to the previous book (BEST FINGERING FOR GUITAR SCALES).
Because if I don't do it, who will? Costas?
https://mega.nz/file/dJg0xSCS...
password for rar: tirandocompleto
******************
Links to social media:
This is a follow-up to my previous post regarding scales and how to play them.
Here I present to you the book I wrote which offers ONLY 2 (!) fingering variations for ALL scales. So yet another "ancient" problem put to rest once and for all.
Download link: https://mega.nz/file/VFAADDYL...
password: tirandocompleto
******************
Links to social media:
What, must Nick Papadopoulos fix everything guitar people? EVERYTHING??? Wasn't it enough that I discovered a new technique (Tirando Completo©), that I am changing the design of the classical guitar (more info on that within the year), MUST I also write fingerings for you on the sheet???? And where, ON SCALES!!!!!!!
And they still sell these crappy books and in very high prices, unbelievable! (look at the photos)
A poor guy here attempted to "understand" what's going on with the scales and look at the mess:
https://www.scribd.com/document/407485255/segovia-scales-pdf
(They uploaded it at scribd.com, how could they miss such a legendary essay.. (rolls eyes))
Thankfully the case has already closed SUCCESFULLY, it took me only an afternoon to solve this.
Maybe I will prepare my own pdf soon to share with the rest of the guitarists out there, we 'll see.
ONCE AGAIN SHAME ON THEM -> 0
******************
Links to social media:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/YYYQLurXbfZY8wpc/
[5-LESSON LEARNING COURSE]
~
Lesson 1: Meeting with the guitarist, assessment of his/ her playing skills and habits (The guitarist must play something)/ Discussion about existing right hand techniques and their problems.
Lesson 2: “Maximum Power”: Human Anatomy analysis (theory)/ Tirando Completo presentation in action/ First tryout of Tirando Completo by the guitarist.
Lesson 3: “Optimal Sound Quality”: Physics analysis (theory)/ Discussion about nails (hint: not needed anymore)/ Further calibration of the guitarist’s Tirando Completo.
Lesson 4: Additional benefits of Tirando Completo in various aspects/ Tryouts of each by the guitarist.
Lesson 5: Final confirmation of the guitarist’s proper execution of Tirando Completo and answering final questions (if any)/ Handing of certificate in Tirando Completo learning signed by the creator Nick Papadopoulos along with a copy of the copyrighted book “Tirando Completo - New Classical Guitar Technique”/ Commemorative photo.
~
Tirando Completo instructor: Nick Papadopoulos, creator of NPDT Process & Tirando Completo
Lesson duration: 40-45 minutes
Package price (all 5 lessons): 600 euros
******************
Links to social media:
I would like to say I warm thank you to the kind, talented and open-minded luthier of musical instruments παναγιωτης Λαμπης (Panagiotis Lampis) for the chance he is giving me to explore manufacturing differentiations on the guitar. I wish that our collaboration will carry on as smoothly in the future too.
(comment for the guitarists: we left the guitar sleeve as it was, for now the interest is for the right hand to be tested)
******************
Links to social media:
Friends of the classical guitar, it is with joy to announce that Tirando Completo© has now gotten its own home!
It is located in Thessaloniki, at Chourmouzi 2 street (K. Toumba), and I personally will be teaching conventional classical guitar technique BUT ALSO Tirando Completo©* (this for the 1st time ever!!!)
I am very happy and proud for this development, from the bottom of my heart I wish that the guitar world will hug this venture which ultimately aims to the evolution of the guitar and guitarists.
I await you,
Nick Papadopoulos [creator of NPDT Process© & Tirando Completo©]
Contact me at +30 6934687000 (mobile)
or via social media.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
* Seminar/ learning course for professional guitarists will be announced in the coming days
******************
Links to social media:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/yBiK8FLtbDQghMHJ/
«Tirando Completo©
An improved right-hand technique
for the classical guitar
INTRODUCTION
Regarding right-hand techniques for the classical guitar Wikiversity writes:
The two primary plucking techniques are:
· Rest-stroke (apoyando), in which the finger that plucks the string rests on the next string afterwards; and
· Free-stroke (tirando), in which the finger hits nothing after plucking the string.
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Classical_guitar_technique
Wikipedia writes:
Tirando is a method of plucking used in classical guitar and flamenco guitar. Tirando is Spanish for "pulling" (in English, it is also called a "free stroke"). After plucking, the finger does not touch the string that is next lowest in pitch (physically higher) on the guitar, as it does with apoyando.
Since the end of the 20th century, many professional classical guitarists prefer tirando, and have moved away from thinking of apoyando as the basic principle of guitar technique.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tirando
The above is considered factual information among all guitarists. Both techniques are being widely used, each serving different purposes and needs. One could simplify it by saying apoyando allows for strength and speed while tirando is the way for easier chords, arrpegios and generally less agressive but better/fuller sound. Classical guitarists do indeed tend to use tirando more often in order to achieve polyphony, while for obvious reasons flamenco guitarists use apoyando mostly as their favorite.
Of the two techniques mentioned, apoyando has always been the least problematic. Everybody masters it with ease, it feels strong and confortable and gives the player the confidence to achieve absolute performing. It is no coincidence that when teaching the guitar to a newbie we prefer start him/her with apoyando. Tirando technique, on the other hand, varies widely from guitarist to gutarist. Not only does it affect each individual's sound quality and character, but also the arm, wrist and hand position all the way to the fingernails!
Being a classical guitarist myself I always came across these problems when trying tirando (apoyando was never an issue). Many times throughout my guitar journey I caught myself adjusting my tirando. For instance, let's say my fingernails grew bigger>I would adjust my tirando. Let's say that for some reason I would get accustomed to a new right hand position>I would adjust my tirando. Or I would change the angle of my wrist>I would adjust my tirando. And this happened automatically, not deliberately! But yet, not something to pass unnoticed.
That led me to believe that there is something wrong with my technique. Then again I knew that there was no strain whatsoever when playing, nor did I have a problem with my sound quality or speed. None of my teachers had anything to correct either. It was just that from time to time something would slightly vary, be it my right hand/arm/wrist position or even the way I "hit" the strings. (Notice that I wrote "hit" and not hit, there is a reason for that and I'll explain it later on)
Not so long ago, my thoughts were that there might be something wrong with the tirando technique itself. And that perhaps that's why everybody seems to find their own technique of tirando based on either what's confortable for them, or how they get used to playing or whatever. I know that tirando is supposed to be a "free" stroke, but I would expect more sophisticated background from a technique. And that's not to say that tirando is without goals, it's just that it provides no specific "path" as to how to achieve them except for some very general guidelines. I believe that a proper technique should offer that in order to be considered effective.
INEFFICENCY OF TIRANDO
One major problem of tirando is its lack of strength. Sure, there 'll be many to argue that there are great guitarists out there that managed to play the guitar achieving loud and rich sound and I wouldn't deny that. But that's not the matter here. There are artists without arms that can paint masterpieces with their feet, does that mean that painting with the feet is a better technique than using the hands? Of course not. So why shouldn't one blame tirando for this major major drawback? Especially since apoyando, tirando's rival let's say, does offer strength with ease.
Another problem is that it is so "free", as mentioned it the previous chapter, that it allows the player to adjust it to his/her liking to a point where you can see all kinds of variations of postures, guitar angles, hand angles, fingernail shapes, you name it. While that doesn't actually sound bad on its own, leaving space for each individual to bring his own style, it sure demonstrates the weakness of the tirando technique as being vague and without basic principles. Do what you like doesn't sound like a technique, does it?
At this point one might say: "But we don't do what we like, we have specific way to pull the string, specific fingernail shape, specific finger movement etc". Then why do we see so many differences among guitarists, in all of those aspects? Does everybody pull the string the same way, does everybody have the same fingernail shape, does everybody move the fingers the same way? I think not. How different is apoyando among guitarists? Besides anatomical reasons, which of course would always allow for slight diversities, the same!
Thus one must realise that all this advice on how to play tirando properly is not a guideline of the technique itself rather than advice of our teachers based on their own experience. Let's be honest, tirando identifies itself as a technique that "is not apoyando"! What could one expect...
IS TIRANDO USELESS?
ABSOLUTELY NOT! But in my opinion it is incomplete. It is a technique that sets goals (eg lighter/faster string pulling) and sets some ground rules (eg let's NOT rest on the next string, let's run like a "little man") but never actually goes on to explain how exactly it should be performed, leaving infinite space for the individual to suit oneself.
Whoever finds his tirando technique and sound, good for him! Others may never succeed in that and end up quitting, following a bad technique with crappy results and others even injuring themselves. This research tends to create the illusion to some that they might were never meant to be guitarists in the first place, that they don't "have it", and vice versa.
Not to mention that tirando too is responsible for the guitar to be such a low-volume instrument and be considered as such. Of course the guitar is not that powerful by its nature, but I don't think that would be the case if, let's say, we all played the guitar using only apoyando.
THOUGHTS THAT LED TO A DISCOVERY
As I mentioned earlier, my tirando has always been a beacon of problems and worrying. There were times that I felt afraid to pull the strings to perform a sforzando for example, for fear of injuring myself or breaking a nail OR I would subconsiously make slight alterations to my playing in order to play it. Both situations didn't feel right. In fact, I can never say I felt really comfortable with this technique my whole life. That wasn't the case with apoyando or rasgueado even.
To me it has always been obvious that it's impossible to achieve proper technique by grabbing a ruler or by mimicking others or by standing in front of a mirror. How we look incorporating a technique is a final byproduct of that technique, it is not a goal. Nor is it logical to approach it that way, because we KNOW we are not exactly the same anatomically. If you wanted to be sure that you do an exercise properly in the gym, you should probably count on the rules of the exercise (for instance: keep legs bent) and the feeling of it while performing it, not how you look while doing it compared to another person. Even if you could succesfully replicate how the other person looks like, that doesn't necessarily guarantee that you got it right! So the looks of a technique is not good enough for me. I needed a basic feeling out of it.
That need for a proper feeling reminded me of a short era when I started taking tennis lessons (I've always admired that sport). I remember vividly how specific our teacher would become on how to hit the ball with the racket. At first, I was even skeptical if there was need for such teaching. It seemed simple, right? Well let me inform you: If you hit the ball an inch further from the center of the racket you could even get your shoulder disslocated, no kidding. But that wasn't all. You had to actually not hit the ball but "hit" it (remember that?), it was more of a push and roll rather than hit. Whenever I got it right I was powerful and it felt so right! When not, well it was a meh feeling.
This memory got me thinking: What if there was some way to improve my technique and get a nicer and stronger feeling out of pulling a string? The next thing that came to my mind was the piano. How bad should we guitarists feel that a multi-step mechanism (very indirect sound production) can be so stable, precise and goodsounding, while we that have direct sound production ability can't? I thought then: I want a technique that offers me that, I want to turn my right hand into a mechanism (like the piano has one) that will perform effectively EVERY TIME I use it.
I know how pushing a button on the piano feels, and it was then I realised that my tirando rules on how my mechanism works had never ever been set! That's why the fingers would adjust their movement now and then, because there was never clear reasoning behind their movement, there was never a specific rule that drove them, there was never a specific feeling to be satisfied. It was plain chance. It was an anti-apoyando techique and nothing more.
When I finally thought of a ground rule to follow in order to satisfy a specific feeling, I was on my first step to a new discovery...»
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The unveiling strategy of Tirando Completo© is yet to be decided. For suggestions and updates please visit the Facebook page of Tirando Completo© at facebook.com/TirandoCompleto
Copyright© 2018 NPDT-Process©, All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy